Seek Returns logo

IP vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPSCI
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyService Corporation International
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization24.64 billion USD11.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPSCI
5-Day Price Return0.02%-1.29%
13-Week Price Return-9.15%0.55%
26-Week Price Return-5.12%0.90%
52-Week Price Return-2.16%9.48%
Month-to-Date Return0.56%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return-13.30%2.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.62M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.09M0.99M
3-Month Volatility34.35%18.73%
Beta1.130.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPSCI
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%32.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%3.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%12.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%22.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%26.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPSCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.330.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.533.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.713.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.30% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SCI

1.54%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Yield of 1.54% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPSCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.30%1.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%33.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

SCI

21.63

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.63 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SCI

2.73

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

SCI’s P/B Ratio of 7.43 is in the upper tier for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IP vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPSCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--21.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.122.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.337.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9418.34