Seek Returns logo

IP vs. ONON: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and ONON, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPONON
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyOn Holding AG
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization24.82 billion USD14.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962September 15, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and ONON by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. ONON: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPONON
5-Day Price Return-1.57%2.33%
13-Week Price Return-6.89%-24.59%
26-Week Price Return-15.21%-13.61%
52-Week Price Return-1.30%6.57%
Month-to-Date Return0.58%-6.86%
Year-to-Date Return-12.65%-17.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.60M10.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.33M5.65M
3-Month Volatility35.68%39.21%
Beta1.122.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ONON

15.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

ONON’s Return on Equity of 15.64% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ONON

8.24%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

ONON’s Net Profit Margin of 8.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ONON

9.86%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

ONON’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.86% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPONON
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%15.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%9.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%8.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%9.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%60.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ONON

2.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

ONON’s Current Ratio of 2.80 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ONON

0.23

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, ONON’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ONON

1.62

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, ONON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPONON
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.332.80
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.962.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.711.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. ONON: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. ONON: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ONON

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

ONON currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ONON

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

ONON has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPONON
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

ONON

56.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

A P/E Ratio of 56.39 places ONON in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ONON

4.65

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

ONON’s P/S Ratio of 4.65 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ONON

7.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

ONON’s P/B Ratio of 7.87 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IP vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPONON
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--56.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.144.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.337.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.6426.43