Seek Returns logo

IP vs. OI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and OI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPOI
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyO-I Glass, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization24.22 billion USD1.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962December 11, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and OI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. OI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPOI
5-Day Price Return-1.12%-4.24%
13-Week Price Return-8.00%-20.99%
26-Week Price Return-14.48%6.70%
52-Week Price Return-4.32%-3.04%
Month-to-Date Return-1.12%-4.24%
Year-to-Date Return-14.75%14.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.36M1.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.12M1.59M
3-Month Volatility34.38%38.30%
Beta1.130.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

OI

-21.35%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

OI has a negative Return on Equity of -21.35%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

OI

-3.93%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

OI has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

OI

2.76%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

OI’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.76% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPOI
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%-21.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%-2.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%-3.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%2.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%15.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OI

1.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

OI’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

OI

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

OI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

OI

1.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, OI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPOI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.24
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.534.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.711.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. OI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. OI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.37%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.37% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OI

0.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

OI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

OI

0.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

OI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPOI
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.37%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

OI

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for OI is currently unavailable.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.10

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OI

0.30

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

OI’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 falls below the typical floor for the Containers & Packaging industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

OI

1.84

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

OI’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP vs. OI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPOI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.100.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.331.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.946.20