Seek Returns logo

IP vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPMGA
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyMagna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization24.42 billion USD13.38 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPMGA
5-Day Price Return2.05%3.06%
13-Week Price Return-6.47%25.19%
26-Week Price Return-15.29%22.63%
52-Week Price Return-5.32%18.85%
Month-to-Date Return-0.32%4.60%
Year-to-Date Return-14.07%9.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.83M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.09M1.14M
3-Month Volatility35.86%25.24%
Beta1.131.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.718.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.31% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA

4.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.08%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.31%4.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

MGA

11.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--11.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.120.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.330.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.727.27