Seek Returns logo

IP vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPMBLY
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyMobileye Global Inc.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization26.08 billion USD11.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 26, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPMBLY
5-Day Price Return4.37%-0.58%
13-Week Price Return1.56%-13.63%
26-Week Price Return-13.58%-23.83%
52-Week Price Return2.98%-8.90%
Month-to-Date Return5.67%-3.02%
Year-to-Date Return-8.23%-30.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.85M3.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.34M5.38M
3-Month Volatility35.71%51.23%
Beta1.120.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPMBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.336.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.965.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.71-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.145.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.331.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.6419.33