IP vs. LEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at IP and LEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	IP	LEN
Company Name	International Paper Company	Lennar Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	19.43 billion USD	29.90 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and LEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. LEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	IP	LEN
5-Day Price Return	-4.70%	-9.04%
13-Week Price Return	-21.70%	-13.19%
26-Week Price Return	-27.09%	5.29%
52-Week Price Return	-35.55%	-30.07%
Month-to-Date Return	-5.05%	-7.81%
Year-to-Date Return	-31.83%	-12.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.14M	4.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.59M	3.57M
3-Month Volatility	35.99%	31.69%
Beta	1.12	1.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-8.23%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 33.32%
Q3: 19.47%
Median: 12.36%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -12.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -8.23%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LEN

11.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.77%
Q3: 17.22%
Median: 11.18%
Q1: 6.35%
Min: -7.31%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 11.21% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.45%
Q3: 8.67%
Median: 5.36%
Q1: 3.40%
Min: -2.25%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LEN

7.72%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 16.03%
Q3: 9.13%
Median: 6.61%
Q1: 3.40%
Min: -4.24%

LEN’s Net Profit Margin of 7.72% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.41%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 12.87%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 6.39%
Min: -0.41%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.41%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LEN

10.32%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.79%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 9.44%
Q1: 5.22%
Min: -3.50%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.32% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	IP	LEN
Return on Equity (TTM)	-8.23%	11.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-3.48%	7.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-0.12%	7.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-0.41%	10.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	28.30%	12.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.31

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.11
Q3: 1.55
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN

9.39

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.43
Q3: 3.68
Median: 2.54
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.75

LEN’s Current Ratio of 9.39 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.58

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 3.86
Q3: 1.96
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.67
Min: 0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LEN

0.24

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.77
Q3: 0.83
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	IP	LEN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	9.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.04	1.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.58	0.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.71	11.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

4.56%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.42%
Q3: 5.04%
Median: 3.96%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: 0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 4.56% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LEN

1.77%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.27%
Q3: 3.94%
Median: 1.84%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.77% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 63.96%
Q1: 27.01%
Min: 0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LEN

19.71%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 154.55%
Q3: 65.87%
Median: 40.54%
Q1: 6.74%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.71% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	IP	LEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.56%	1.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	180.00%	19.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 19.86
Q3: 18.86
Median: 16.72
Q1: 13.58
Min: 6.36

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

LEN

11.17

Household Durables Industry

Max: 33.05
Q3: 20.97
Median: 12.60
Q1: 9.92
Min: 6.71

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 11.17 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

0.89

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.14
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN

0.86

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.29
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.86
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.15

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.85
Median: 2.17
Q1: 1.46
Min: 0.76

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LEN

1.52

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.77
Q3: 2.08
Median: 1.44
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.52 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	IP	LEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	11.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.89	0.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.41	1.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	57.13	13.43