Seek Returns logo

IOT vs. PAGS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IOT and PAGS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIOTPAGS
Company NameSamsara Inc.PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization18.79 billion USD2.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 15, 2021January 24, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IOT and PAGS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IOT vs. PAGS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIOTPAGS
5-Day Price Return2.42%-4.11%
13-Week Price Return-30.70%-7.19%
26-Week Price Return-41.46%8.40%
52-Week Price Return-18.20%-42.53%
Month-to-Date Return-13.23%7.15%
Year-to-Date Return-24.47%34.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.07M4.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.84M5.59M
3-Month Volatility38.54%54.94%
Beta1.611.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IOT

-11.61%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

IOT has a negative Return on Equity of -11.61%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PAGS

14.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

PAGS’s Return on Equity of 14.95% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IOT

-9.04%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

IOT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.04%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PAGS

11.04%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

PAGS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IOT

-11.77%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

IOT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -11.77%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PAGS

36.35%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

PAGS’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.35% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIOTPAGS
Return on Equity (TTM)-11.61%14.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)-6.20%3.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-9.04%11.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-11.77%36.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.57%50.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IOT

1.53

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

IOT’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAGS

1.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IOT

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

IOT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAGS

0.24

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IOT

-349.17

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

IOT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -349.17. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PAGS

1.64

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIOTPAGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.531.42
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.481.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-349.171.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

IOT vs. PAGS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IOT vs. PAGS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IOT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IOT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PAGS

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAGS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IOT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IOT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PAGS

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAGS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIOTPAGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IOT

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for IOT is currently unavailable.

PAGS

7.07

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, PAGS’s P/E Ratio of 7.07 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IOT

14.07

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

IOT’s P/S Ratio of 14.07 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAGS

0.78

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IOT

20.88

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

IOT’s P/B Ratio of 20.88 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAGS

1.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

PAGS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IOT vs. PAGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIOTPAGS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--7.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)14.070.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.881.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)135.596.82