Seek Returns logo

IONQ vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IONQ and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IONQ is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolIONQSONY
Company NameIonQ, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization11.81 billion USD168.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 4, 2021February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IONQ and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IONQ vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIONQSONY
5-Day Price Return-1.12%0.92%
13-Week Price Return18.60%15.46%
26-Week Price Return17.21%19.67%
52-Week Price Return411.97%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return-0.23%13.20%
Year-to-Date Return-4.76%23.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.28M18.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.06M14.80M
3-Month Volatility99.81%31.61%
Beta2.601.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIONQSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)-67.52%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)-57.89%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-885.21%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-700.61%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.54%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIONQSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.761.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)7.261.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-23.93104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

IONQ vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IONQ vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIONQSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

208.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 208.53, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IONQ vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIONQSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--22.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)208.532.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.682.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--12.66