Seek Returns logo

IONQ vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IONQ and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIONQNTAP
Company NameIonQ, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization16.96 billion USD21.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 4, 2021November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IONQ and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IONQ vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIONQNTAP
5-Day Price Return-14.79%-2.72%
13-Week Price Return17.28%0.60%
26-Week Price Return42.02%9.96%
52-Week Price Return76.31%-8.56%
Month-to-Date Return-24.37%-7.08%
Year-to-Date Return12.95%-5.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume27.01M1.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume26.23M1.88M
3-Month Volatility95.62%28.14%
Beta2.721.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IONQ

-127.93%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -127.93%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP

120.04%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 120.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-1,836.32%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,836.32%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP

17.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.77% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-604.47%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -604.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTAP

20.70%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.70% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIONQNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)-127.93%120.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)-83.48%12.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1,836.32%17.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-604.47%20.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.29%70.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

8.73

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 8.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTAP

1.31

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTAP

2.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIONQNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.731.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.251.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-23.9317.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

IONQ vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IONQ vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.93%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.93% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIONQNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

NTAP

18.66

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.66 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

212.07

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 212.07, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTAP

3.32

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

8.74

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 8.74 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP

21.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 21.54, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IONQ vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIONQNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--18.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)212.073.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.7421.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--13.18