IONQ vs. NOK: IonQ vs. Nokia Stock Comparison

Company Profile

IonQ (IONQ) and Nokia (NOK) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals while NOK is classified in Communications Equipment.

Nokia (NOK) has more than two decades of public-market history since July 1, 1994, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

IonQ (IONQ) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nokia (NOK) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Nokia (NOK) is closer to market-like at 1.24 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% and Nokia (NOK) at 3.88% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Nokia (NOK) at 3.75% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Nokia (NOK) reports 10.81%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Nokia (NOK) at 3.48%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Nokia (NOK) reports EPS growth of -47.83%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Nokia (NOK) at 1.46 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Nokia (NOK) at 0.16 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nokia (NOK) reports a yield of 1.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Nokia (NOK) reports payout ratio above 100% at 100.17%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Nokia (NOK) at 47.88 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Nokia (NOK) at 2.08 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

On P/B ratio, both IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 and Nokia (NOK) at 1.82 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics