Seek Returns logo

IONQ vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IONQ and MU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIONQMU
Company NameIonQ, Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization12.23 billion USD139.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 4, 2021June 1, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IONQ and MU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IONQ vs. MU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIONQMU
5-Day Price Return1.78%11.08%
13-Week Price Return25.30%34.65%
26-Week Price Return-0.15%31.45%
52-Week Price Return513.24%31.31%
Month-to-Date Return3.36%13.86%
Year-to-Date Return-1.34%47.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume22.93M22.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.86M23.44M
3-Month Volatility98.83%40.91%
Beta2.611.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIONQMU
Return on Equity (TTM)-67.52%13.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)-57.89%8.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-885.21%18.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-700.61%22.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.54%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MU

2.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MU

0.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIONQMU
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.762.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)7.261.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-23.9320.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

IONQ vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IONQ vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MU

0.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.37% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIONQMU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%8.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

MU

22.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

MU’s P/E Ratio of 22.40 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

233.58

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 233.58, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MU

4.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MU’s P/S Ratio of 4.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MU

2.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IONQ vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIONQMU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--22.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)233.584.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.682.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--69.91