IMO vs. WDS: Imperial Oil vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Imperial Oil (IMO) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Imperial Oil (IMO) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Imperial Oil Limited | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | Canada | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 58.92 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE American | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.68% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 34.62% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.18% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.00% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.72% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 573.33K | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.05 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.24% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.93% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.88% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.36% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.08% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.42% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.56% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.24% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -17.26% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.30 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.49% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.78 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.38 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.90% | 1.41% |