Seek Returns logo

IMO vs. WDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IMO and WDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IMO is a standard domestic listing, while WDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolIMOWDS
Company NameImperial Oil LimitedWoodside Energy Group Ltd
CountryCanadaAustralia
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization47.45 billion USD29.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IMO and WDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IMO vs. WDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIMOWDS
5-Day Price Return-3.34%-2.56%
13-Week Price Return15.99%-4.79%
26-Week Price Return20.80%-4.03%
52-Week Price Return32.62%-12.32%
Month-to-Date Return1.26%-0.78%
Year-to-Date Return42.44%-7.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.92M6.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.73M5.01M
3-Month Volatility18.70%22.74%
Beta1.281.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IMO

19.47%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

In the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Return on Equity of 19.47% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WDS

8.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

WDS’s Return on Equity of 8.31% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

9.51%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

IMO’s Net Profit Margin of 9.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WDS

21.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.42% places WDS in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

12.03%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

IMO’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.03% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WDS

28.80%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

WDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 28.80% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIMOWDS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.47%8.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.83%4.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.51%21.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.03%28.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.75%39.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

1.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

IMO’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WDS

1.90

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

WDS’s Current Ratio of 1.90 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

0.16

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WDS

0.38

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

WDS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IMO

157.33

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 157.33, IMO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

WDS

23.23

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

WDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.23 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIMOWDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.581.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.341.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.160.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)157.3323.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

IMO vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IMO vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IMO

2.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Yield of 2.04% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WDS

8.02%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.02%, WDS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IMO

27.94%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WDS

78.46%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

WDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.46% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIMOWDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.04%8.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%78.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IMO

13.67

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

IMO’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WDS

9.79

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

WDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.79 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IMO

1.30

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

IMO’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WDS

2.10

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

WDS’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

2.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

IMO’s P/B Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WDS

0.83

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

WDS’s P/B Ratio of 0.83 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IMO vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIMOWDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.679.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.302.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.190.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.3129.04