Seek Returns logo

IMO vs. TGS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IMO and TGS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IMO is a standard domestic listing, while TGS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolIMOTGS
Company NameImperial Oil LimitedTransportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
CountryCanadaArgentina
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization45.95 billion USD3.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IMO and TGS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IMO vs. TGS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIMOTGS
5-Day Price Return-4.07%--
13-Week Price Return13.41%--
26-Week Price Return22.78%--
52-Week Price Return24.87%--
Month-to-Date Return-1.20%--
Year-to-Date Return40.74%--
10-Day Avg. Volume0.94M--
3-Month Avg. Volume0.74M--
3-Month Volatility18.26%--
Beta1.28--

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IMO

19.47%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

In the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Return on Equity of 19.47% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TGS

15.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

TGS’s Return on Equity of 15.04% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

9.51%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

IMO’s Net Profit Margin of 9.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TGS

25.93%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.93% places TGS in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

12.03%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

IMO’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.03% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TGS

44.33%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 44.33% places TGS in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIMOTGS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.47%15.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.83%10.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.51%25.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.03%44.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.75%53.98%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

1.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

IMO’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TGS

3.35

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

TGS’s Current Ratio of 3.35 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

0.16

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TGS

0.26

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

TGS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IMO

157.33

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 157.33, IMO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TGS

4.23

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

TGS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIMOTGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.583.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.343.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.160.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)157.334.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

IMO vs. TGS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IMO vs. TGS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IMO

2.07%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TGS

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

TGS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IMO

27.94%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TGS

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

TGS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIMOTGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IMO

13.51

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

IMO’s P/E Ratio of 13.51 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TGS

6.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, TGS’s P/E Ratio of 6.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IMO

1.28

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

IMO’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TGS

1.68

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

TGS’s P/S Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

2.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

IMO’s P/B Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TGS

0.87

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

TGS’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IMO vs. TGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIMOTGS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.516.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.281.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.190.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.148.22