IMO vs. KMI: Imperial Oil vs. Kinder Morgan Stock Comparison
How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Imperial Oil (IMO) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while KMI falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Imperial Oil Limited | Kinder Morgan Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 58.92 billion USD | 66.74 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE American | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 11, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.68% | 19.50% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 34.62% | 29.33% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.18% | 18.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Kinder Morgan (KMI) is heavily traded at around 12.88M shares per day, whereas Imperial Oil (IMO) sees a more moderate 573.33K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.00% | 22.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.72% | -20.31% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 573.33K | 12.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.05 | 0.69 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 11.43% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
KMI
Energy industry group
11.43%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- KMI
- 11.43%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 19.64% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
KMI
Energy industry group
19.64%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- KMI
- 19.64%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 24.03% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
KMI
Energy industry group
24.03%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- KMI
- 24.03%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.24% | 11.43% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.93% | 4.44% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.88% | 19.64% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.36% | 24.03% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.08% | 48.65% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 12.17% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 17.09% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.42% | 12.17% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.56% | -4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.24% | 17.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -17.26% | 6.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for KMI.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
KMI
Energy industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- KMI
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 1.02 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
KMI
Energy industry group
1.02
- Max
- 1.75
- KMI
- 1.02
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.30 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 1.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 4.23 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 3.93% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, KMI the richer one.
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KMI
Energy industry group
3.93%
- Max
- 8.57%
- KMI
- 3.93%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 72.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KMI
Energy industry group
72.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- KMI
- 72.84%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 3.93% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.49% | 72.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 18.49 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
KMI
Energy industry group
18.49
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- KMI
- 18.49
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 3.64 sits in the pricier quartile — KMI costs more per dollar of sales.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
KMI
Energy industry group
3.64
- Max
- 5.40
- KMI
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 2.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
KMI
Energy industry group
2.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- KMI
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMO | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.78 | 18.49 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 3.64 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.38 | 2.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.90% | 1.61% |