Seek Returns logo

ILMN vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ILMN and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ILMN is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolILMNPHG
Company NameIllumina, Inc.Koninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization15.53 billion USD26.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 28, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ILMN and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ILMN vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolILMNPHG
5-Day Price Return6.37%3.74%
13-Week Price Return3.98%16.38%
26-Week Price Return28.87%3.74%
52-Week Price Return-25.92%-18.89%
Month-to-Date Return6.37%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return-24.40%-2.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.78M1.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M1.56M
3-Month Volatility43.73%25.90%
Beta1.411.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ILMN

55.15%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

ILMN’s Return on Equity of 55.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ILMN

29.37%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.37% places ILMN in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ILMN

30.21%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places ILMN in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolILMNPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)55.15%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.47%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.37%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.21%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.09%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

1.81

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

ILMN’s Current Ratio of 1.81 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

0.88

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

ILMN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

-2.28

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

ILMN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.28. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolILMNPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.811.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.280.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.281.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

ILMN vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ILMN vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolILMNPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

12.44

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ILMN’s P/E Ratio of 12.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PHG

140.93

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

At 140.93, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

3.65

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

ILMN’s P/S Ratio of 3.65 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHG

1.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.27 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

6.69

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

ILMN’s P/B Ratio of 6.69 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ILMN vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolILMNPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.44140.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.651.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.691.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1814.75