Seek Returns logo

ILMN vs. NVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ILMN and NVS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ILMN is a standard domestic listing, while NVS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolILMNNVS
Company NameIllumina, Inc.Novartis AG
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization15.72 billion USD254.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 28, 2000November 7, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ILMN and NVS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ILMN vs. NVS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolILMNNVS
5-Day Price Return10.92%2.34%
13-Week Price Return4.19%2.27%
26-Week Price Return24.28%2.04%
52-Week Price Return-21.59%9.24%
Month-to-Date Return7.68%-1.03%
Year-to-Date Return-23.48%12.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.87M2.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.97M2.81M
3-Month Volatility43.48%18.12%
Beta1.40-0.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ILMN

55.15%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

ILMN’s Return on Equity of 55.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NVS

32.56%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

In the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, NVS’s Return on Equity of 32.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ILMN

29.37%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.37% places ILMN in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NVS

24.90%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.90% places NVS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ILMN

30.21%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places ILMN in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NVS

30.03%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.03% places NVS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolILMNNVS
Return on Equity (TTM)55.15%32.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.47%13.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.37%24.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.21%30.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.09%76.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

1.81

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

ILMN’s Current Ratio of 1.81 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVS

0.82

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

NVS’s Current Ratio of 0.82 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

0.88

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

ILMN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NVS

0.77

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

NVS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

-2.28

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

ILMN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.28. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NVS

22.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

NVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.55 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolILMNNVS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.810.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.280.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.2822.55

Growth

Revenue Growth

ILMN vs. NVS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ILMN vs. NVS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NVS

3.27%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

NVS’s Dividend Yield of 3.27% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NVS

102.24%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

NVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 102.24% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolILMNNVS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%102.24%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

12.42

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ILMN’s P/E Ratio of 12.42 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NVS

17.49

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

NVS’s P/E Ratio of 17.49 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ILMN

3.65

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

ILMN’s P/S Ratio of 3.65 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NVS

4.35

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

NVS’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ILMN

6.69

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

ILMN’s P/B Ratio of 6.69 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NVS

6.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

NVS’s P/B Ratio of 6.06 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ILMN vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolILMNNVS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.4217.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.654.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.696.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1614.21