Seek Returns logo

IHG vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IHG and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IHG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LULU is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolIHGLULU
Company NameInterContinental Hotels Group PLClululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited KingdomCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization18.39 billion USD20.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 10, 2003July 27, 2007
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IHG and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IHG vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIHGLULU
5-Day Price Return2.47%-0.72%
13-Week Price Return5.95%-25.11%
26-Week Price Return5.30%-47.33%
52-Week Price Return10.74%-36.46%
Month-to-Date Return0.25%-12.00%
Year-to-Date Return-9.85%-53.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.29M5.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.28M4.60M
3-Month Volatility22.85%50.44%
Beta0.991.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IHG

69.59%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, IHG’s Return on Equity of 69.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IHG

14.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

IHG’s Net Profit Margin of 14.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IHG

22.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

IHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.25% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIHGLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)69.59%42.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.49%24.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.65%16.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.25%22.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.43%59.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IHG

0.79

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

IHG’s Current Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IHG

4.71

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

IHG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.71 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IHG

8.94

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

IHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.94 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIHGLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.792.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.710.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.94-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

IHG vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IHG vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IHG

1.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IHG’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IHG

35.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.60% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIHGLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.46%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.60%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IHG

24.44

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

IHG’s P/E Ratio of 24.44 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU

12.50

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.50 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IHG

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

IHG’s P/S Ratio of 3.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

2.05

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IHG

20.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

IHG’s P/B Ratio of 20.02 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IHG vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIHGLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.4412.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.582.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.025.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.9515.51