IFF vs. RIO: Intl Flavors & Fragrances vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and Rio Tinto (RIO) both fall under the Materials industry group, but IFF is classified in Chemicals while RIO is classified in Metals & Mining.
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 20.69 billion USD | 136.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 17, 1974 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 40.13% | 30.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.28% | 16.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -8.71% | 14.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.26% | 30.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.63 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.66% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.88M | 2.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.99 | 0.85 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.71 | 1.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) reports a negative ROE of -7.37%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Rio Tinto (RIO) reports 19.31%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IFF
Materials industry group
-7.37%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- IFF
- -7.37%
- Min
- -32.81%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.68%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IFF
Materials industry group
1.68%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- IFF
- 1.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 9.53% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IFF
Materials industry group
9.53%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- IFF
- 9.53%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -7.37% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.18% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.68% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.53% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 36.27% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at -5.17% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at -248.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.17% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.34% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -248.42% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RIO.
IFF
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- IFF
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 0.51 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IFF
Materials industry group
0.51
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- IFF
- 0.51
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.87 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.51 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.51 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.85% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.
IFF
Materials industry group
1.85%
- Max
- 4.52%
- IFF
- 1.85%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 62.26% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
IFF
Materials industry group
62.26%
- Max
- 83.62%
- IFF
- 62.26%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.85% | 5.59% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 62.26% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 236.06 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.
IFF
Materials industry group
236.06
- IFF
- 236.06
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.91 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
IFF
Materials industry group
1.91
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IFF
- 1.91
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.56 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
IFF
Materials industry group
1.56
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- IFF
- 1.56
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IFF | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 236.06 | 11.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.91 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.56 | 2.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -10.66% | 2.64% |