Seek Returns logo

IFF vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IFF and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIFFMLM
Company NameInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc.Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization17.05 billion USD37.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 17, 1974February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IFF and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IFF vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIFFMLM
5-Day Price Return3.55%3.30%
13-Week Price Return-12.89%12.12%
26-Week Price Return-22.36%13.68%
52-Week Price Return-30.56%18.09%
Month-to-Date Return-6.36%7.86%
Year-to-Date Return-21.34%20.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.24M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.91M0.44M
3-Month Volatility28.41%21.85%
Beta1.111.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IFF

-2.80%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

IFF has a negative Return on Equity of -2.80%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MLM

11.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IFF

-3.48%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

IFF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.48%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MLM

16.47%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.47% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IFF

0.50%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

IFF’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MLM

23.04%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIFFMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.80%11.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.39%6.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3.48%16.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.50%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.25%29.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IFF

1.86

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

IFF’s Current Ratio of 1.86 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MLM

2.35

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IFF

0.43

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

IFF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MLM

0.58

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IFF

1.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, IFF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MLM

16.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIFFMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.862.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.911.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.430.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7316.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

IFF vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IFF vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IFF

2.45%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

IFF’s Dividend Yield of 2.45% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MLM

0.52%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.52% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IFF

30.40%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

IFF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.40% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MLM

17.62%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIFFMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.45%0.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.40%17.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IFF

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

P/E Ratio data for IFF is currently unavailable.

MLM

33.80

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 33.80 places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IFF

1.48

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

IFF’s P/S Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MLM

5.57

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.57, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IFF

1.31

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

IFF’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MLM

3.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 3.53, MLM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IFF vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIFFMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.485.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.313.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.3138.05