Seek Returns logo

IDA vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IDA and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IDA is a standard domestic listing, while KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolIDAKEP
Company NameIDACORP, Inc.Korea Electric Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesSouth Korea
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization6.84 billion USD17.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 27, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IDA and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IDA vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIDAKEP
5-Day Price Return0.72%-5.18%
13-Week Price Return7.94%32.04%
26-Week Price Return13.55%81.60%
52-Week Price Return23.11%-7.95%
Month-to-Date Return1.04%-2.72%
Year-to-Date Return15.88%87.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.37M5.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.49M4.51M
3-Month Volatility15.87%66.58%
Beta0.560.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IDA

9.20%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

IDA’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP

13.40%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

KEP’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IDA

16.99%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

IDA’s Net Profit Margin of 16.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KEP

5.72%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.72% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IDA

18.29%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

IDA’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.29% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KEP

11.77%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.77% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIDAKEP
Return on Equity (TTM)9.20%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.24%2.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.99%5.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.29%11.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.24%-19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IDA

1.45

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

IDA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 is in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KEP

0.47

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IDA

1.08

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

IDA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KEP

3.26

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IDA

2.43

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, IDA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.43 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIDAKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.450.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.090.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.083.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.432.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

IDA vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IDA vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IDA

2.68%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

IDA’s Dividend Yield of 2.68% is consistent with its peers in the Electric Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KEP

0.53%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 0.53% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IDA

60.32%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

IDA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.32% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP

4.33%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.33% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIDAKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.68%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.32%4.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IDA

22.49

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

A P/E Ratio of 22.49 places IDA in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KEP

4.56

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 4.56 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IDA

3.82

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

IDA’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Electric Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KEP

0.26

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IDA

1.83

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

IDA’s P/B Ratio of 1.83 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KEP

0.33

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.33 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IDA vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIDAKEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.494.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.820.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.830.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3,137.594.97