Seek Returns logo

ICLR vs. VEEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ICLR and VEEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolICLRVEEV
Company NameICON Public Limited CompanyVeeva Systems Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Technology
Market Capitalization15.08 billion USD48.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 1998October 16, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ICLR and VEEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ICLR vs. VEEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolICLRVEEV
5-Day Price Return18.63%1.12%
13-Week Price Return29.17%4.22%
26-Week Price Return10.80%27.91%
52-Week Price Return-34.14%42.77%
Month-to-Date Return10.79%-0.55%
Year-to-Date Return-7.54%40.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.94M1.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.24M1.45M
3-Month Volatility62.83%27.40%
Beta1.261.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ICLR

8.28%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

ICLR’s Return on Equity of 8.28% is on par with the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VEEV

13.40%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
48.09%
Q3
41.80%
Median
18.17%
Q1
11.64%
Min
11.05%

VEEV’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ICLR

9.82%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

ICLR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VEEV

27.29%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
52.24%
Q3
49.15%
Median
33.59%
Q1
16.86%
Min
13.38%

VEEV’s Net Profit Margin of 27.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Technology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ICLR

12.50%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

ICLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.50% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VEEV

26.93%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
74.05%
Q3
65.56%
Median
33.50%
Q1
22.83%
Min
21.46%

VEEV’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolICLRVEEV
Return on Equity (TTM)8.28%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.71%10.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.82%27.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.50%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.65%75.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ICLR

1.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

ICLR’s Current Ratio of 1.29 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VEEV

5.57

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
6.49
Q3
6.49
Median
6.02
Q1
3.62
Min
2.96

VEEV’s Current Ratio of 5.57 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ICLR

0.36

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

ICLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VEEV

0.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.14
Q3
0.10
Median
0.01
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, VEEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ICLR

4.80

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

ICLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.80 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VEEV

169.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
224.12
Q3
224.12
Median
219.00
Q1
219.00
Min
219.00

VEEV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 169.00 is below the typical range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests a weaker ability to meet debt obligations compared to its peers and may indicate a higher level of financial risk.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolICLRVEEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.295.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.245.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.80169.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

ICLR vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ICLR vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ICLR

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ICLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.89%
Q3
0.70%
Median
0.15%
Q1
0.04%
Min
0.00%

VEEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ICLR

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ICLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
101.92%
Q3
87.10%
Median
42.63%
Q1
10.66%
Min
0.00%

VEEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolICLRVEEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ICLR

18.97

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ICLR’s P/E Ratio of 18.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VEEV

60.35

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
280.41
Q3
225.12
Median
59.01
Q1
44.08
Min
39.20

VEEV’s P/E Ratio of 60.35 is within the middle range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ICLR

1.86

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ICLR’s P/S Ratio of 1.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VEEV

16.47

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
146.49
Q3
115.78
Median
19.83
Q1
7.94
Min
5.25

VEEV’s P/S Ratio of 16.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ICLR

1.21

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

ICLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VEEV

7.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
115.01
Q3
89.07
Median
9.11
Q1
4.04
Min
3.06

VEEV’s P/B Ratio of 7.00 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Technology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ICLR vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolICLRVEEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.9760.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.8616.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.217.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.2236.81