ICE vs. PUK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ICE and PUK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ICE is a standard domestic listing, while PUK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	ICE	PUK
Company Name	Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.	Prudential plc
Country	United States	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Insurance
Market Capitalization	102.54 billion USD	34.69 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 16, 2005	June 29, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ICE and PUK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ICE vs. PUK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	PUK
5-Day Price Return	0.49%	1.90%
13-Week Price Return	2.95%	20.86%
26-Week Price Return	7.30%	37.42%
52-Week Price Return	12.95%	50.78%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.08%	3.63%
Year-to-Date Return	20.22%	56.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.29M	2.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.63M	3.79M
3-Month Volatility	13.14%	18.17%
Beta	1.11	1.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ICE

10.79%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

ICE’s Return on Equity of 10.79% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PUK

13.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

PUK’s Return on Equity of 13.58% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ICE

23.92%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

ICE’s Net Profit Margin of 23.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PUK

19.26%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.26% places PUK in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ICE

37.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

ICE’s Operating Profit Margin of 37.42% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PUK

20.87%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	PUK
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.79%	13.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.14%	1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.92%	19.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	37.42%	20.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	77.17%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

1.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PUK

0.36

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

0.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

PUK

0.27

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ICE

5.28

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

PUK

8.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	PUK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.01	0.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.00	0.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.68	0.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.28	8.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

ICE vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ICE vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ICE

1.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PUK

1.62%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Yield of 1.62% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ICE

35.80%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.80% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PUK

24.16%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.16% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	PUK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.05%	1.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	35.80%	24.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ICE

34.04

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

A P/E Ratio of 34.04 places ICE in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PUK

14.95

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

PUK’s P/E Ratio of 14.95 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ICE

8.14

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

ICE’s P/S Ratio of 8.14 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PUK

2.88

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

PUK’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

3.70

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

ICE’s P/B Ratio of 3.70 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PUK

1.31

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

PUK’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ICE vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	PUK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	34.04	14.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	8.14	2.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.70	1.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	25.07	9.74