Seek Returns logo

IBN vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBN and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IBN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, PYPL is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolIBNPYPL
Company NameICICI Bank LimitedPayPal Holdings, Inc.
CountryIndiaUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksFinancial Services
Market Capitalization116.58 billion USD67.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 28, 2000July 6, 2015
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBN and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBN vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBNPYPL
5-Day Price Return-1.40%3.53%
13-Week Price Return-2.08%-2.32%
26-Week Price Return12.16%-10.11%
52-Week Price Return21.18%11.30%
Month-to-Date Return-4.33%2.72%
Year-to-Date Return10.70%-17.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.18M11.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.07M10.91M
3-Month Volatility12.68%33.26%
Beta0.251.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBN

17.39%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, IBN’s Return on Equity of 17.39% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PYPL

23.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 23.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBN

27.24%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

IBN’s Net Profit Margin of 27.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PYPL

14.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBN

36.51%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

IBN’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.51% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PYPL

18.17%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.17% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBNPYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)17.39%23.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.04%5.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.24%14.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.51%18.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--41.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBN

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PYPL

1.33

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBN

0.65

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

PYPL

0.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBN

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

PYPL

1,066.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBNPYPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)--1.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--1.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.650.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--1,066.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBN vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBN vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBN

0.69%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

IBN’s Dividend Yield of 0.69% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBN

28.60%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

IBN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBNPYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.69%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.60%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBN

19.20

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 19.20 places IBN in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PYPL

14.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 14.35 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBN

4.33

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

PYPL

2.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBN

3.14

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

At 3.14, IBN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PYPL

3.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

PYPL’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBNPYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.2014.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.332.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.143.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.6012.69