Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMUNH
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationUnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyHealth Care
GICS IndustryIT ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization281.44 billion USD295.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 17, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMUNH
5-Day Price Return-1.11%0.09%
13-Week Price Return27.52%5.87%
26-Week Price Return18.21%3.37%
52-Week Price Return44.93%-46.88%
Month-to-Date Return-0.56%-5.77%
Year-to-Date Return39.06%-36.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.95M9.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M13.84M
3-Month Volatility27.54%37.81%
Beta0.680.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

28.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 28.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNH

18.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.67%
Q3
15.54%
Median
8.37%
Q1
5.49%
Min
-2.09%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 18.60% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

12.09%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.09% places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNH

4.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
9.33%
Q3
4.80%
Median
2.90%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-3.28%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

14.51%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.51% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNH

6.03%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
8.71%
Median
5.10%
Q1
2.10%
Min
-3.07%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.03% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)28.86%18.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.48%5.71%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.09%4.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.51%6.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.81%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.93

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNH

0.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.56
Median
1.28
Q1
0.92
Min
0.01

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.26

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UNH

0.84

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.41
Q3
1.39
Median
0.74
Q1
0.46
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.46
Median
4.52
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.930.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.810.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.260.84
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.576.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.20%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.20%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UNH

2.67%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.51%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.06%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.67%, UNH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

78.74%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.74% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UNH

44.61%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
187.56%
Q3
81.14%
Median
33.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.61% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%2.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)78.74%44.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

35.83

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 35.83 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UNH

16.74

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
48.86
Q3
32.22
Median
21.78
Q1
13.97
Min
8.01

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 16.74 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

4.33

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.33 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UNH

0.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.66
Q3
1.64
Median
0.72
Q1
0.27
Min
0.10

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.42

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.42 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UNH

3.26

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.33
Median
2.48
Q1
1.31
Min
0.65

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 3.26 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.8316.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.330.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.423.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.6716.94