Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMTMUS
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationT-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization269.64 billion USD255.00 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMTMUS
5-Day Price Return0.96%-1.55%
13-Week Price Return-0.23%-2.47%
26-Week Price Return18.88%-15.42%
52-Week Price Return27.45%8.76%
Month-to-Date Return2.59%-5.35%
Year-to-Date Return31.67%2.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.04M4.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.74M4.34M
3-Month Volatility26.64%21.74%
Beta0.670.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.26%
Median
13.73%
Q1
9.72%
Min
-1.57%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
23.76%
Q3
13.90%
Median
10.68%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-1.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.15%
Q1
16.37%
Min
8.96%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMTMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
0.98
Median
0.71
Q1
0.56
Min
0.37

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.17
Median
1.52
Q1
0.93
Min
0.48

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.47
Median
3.79
Q1
1.76
Min
-0.02

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMTMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.911.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.331.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.575.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.29%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TMUS

1.48%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
8.69%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.79%
Q1
2.67%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.48% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
169.59%
Q3
122.96%
Median
73.67%
Q1
63.98%
Min
1.50%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMTMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.29%1.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

46.43

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

A P/E Ratio of 46.43 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TMUS

20.82

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
31.43
Q3
21.97
Median
16.89
Q1
12.46
Min
7.52

TMUS’s P/E Ratio of 20.82 is within the middle range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

4.23

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TMUS

3.03

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.65
Q3
2.21
Median
1.32
Q1
1.17
Min
0.62

TMUS’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 is in the upper echelon for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.86
Median
2.07
Q1
1.40
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IBM vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMTMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)46.4320.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.233.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.964.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.0420.61