Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. SOUN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and SOUN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

IBM’s market capitalization of 263.57 billion USD is substantially larger than SOUN’s 4.65 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

SOUN carries a higher beta at 2.87, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while IBM (beta: 0.65) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolIBMSOUN
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationSoundHound AI, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Application
CEOArvind KrishnaKeyvan Mohajer
Price283.59 USD11.57 USD
Market Cap263.57 billion USD4.65 billion USD
Beta0.652.87
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateSeptember 24, 1915April 28, 2022
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and SOUN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. SOUN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SOUN

-68.55%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

SOUN has a negative Return on Equity of -68.55%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

SOUN

-34.12%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

SOUN has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -34.12%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SOUN

-184.34%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

SOUN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -184.34%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SOUN

-184.97%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

SOUN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -184.97%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMSOUN
Return on Equity (TTM)21.32%-68.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%-32.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.48%-34.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.71%-184.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.36%-184.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.04%44.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SOUN

4.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

SOUN’s Current Ratio of 4.92 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SOUN

0.01

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, SOUN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SOUN

-30.16

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

SOUN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -30.16. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMSOUN
Current Ratio (TTM)1.014.92
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.974.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.490.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.531.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.92-30.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for IBM and SOUN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

IBM

2.95%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.95%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SOUN

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SOUN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

SOUN

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SOUN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMSOUN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.95%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)112.81%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

IBM

48.09

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

A P/E Ratio of 48.09 places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SOUN

-24.18

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

SOUN has a negative P/E Ratio of -24.18. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

IBM

9.24

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.24 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

SOUN

0.24

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, SOUN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.24 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

IBM

4.19

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.19 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SOUN

45.47

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 45.47, SOUN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Application industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

IBM

9.79

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

SOUN

11.48

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

IBM vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMSOUN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)48.09-24.18
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)9.240.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)4.1945.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.7911.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)22.07-43.51
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)25.90-24.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.0843.11