Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and MRVL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMMRVL
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationMarvell Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization225.94 billion USD61.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and MRVL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. MRVL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMMRVL
5-Day Price Return2.29%-9.89%
13-Week Price Return-9.63%13.84%
26-Week Price Return-6.42%-31.19%
52-Week Price Return24.56%0.25%
Month-to-Date Return-4.19%-11.38%
Year-to-Date Return10.34%-35.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.60M13.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.60M19.08M
3-Month Volatility24.47%48.56%
Beta0.691.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MRVL

-4.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MRVL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMMRVL
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%-3.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%-2.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%-7.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%-4.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%43.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MRVL

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMMRVL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.911.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.800.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.330.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.57-4.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MRVL

0.34%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MRVL

27.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.43% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMMRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.76%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%27.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MRVL

9.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 9.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MRVL

4.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMMRVL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.56--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.519.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.964.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.1344.82