Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMLIN
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationLinde plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyMaterials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesChemicals
Market Capitalization225.94 billion USD226.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMLIN
5-Day Price Return2.29%0.99%
13-Week Price Return-9.63%4.79%
26-Week Price Return-6.42%4.62%
52-Week Price Return24.56%5.19%
Month-to-Date Return-4.19%4.80%
Year-to-Date Return10.34%15.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.60M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.60M1.77M
3-Month Volatility24.47%12.85%
Beta0.690.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.910.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.800.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.330.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.5733.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.76%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IBM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.5633.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.516.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.965.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.1344.62