Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. KD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and KD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMKD
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationKyndryl Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization225.94 billion USD7.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 22, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and KD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. KD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMKD
5-Day Price Return2.29%0.76%
13-Week Price Return-9.63%-24.14%
26-Week Price Return-6.42%-27.01%
52-Week Price Return24.56%28.80%
Month-to-Date Return-4.19%-19.72%
Year-to-Date Return10.34%-12.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.60M3.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.60M2.20M
3-Month Volatility24.47%50.51%
Beta0.692.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KD

22.96%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, KD’s Return on Equity of 22.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KD

1.67%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

Falling into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, KD’s Net Profit Margin of 1.67% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KD

2.89%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

KD’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.89% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMKD
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%22.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%2.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%1.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%2.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%20.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KD

1.07

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

KD’s Current Ratio of 1.07 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KD

2.60

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.60, KD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KD

-2.88

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

KD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.88. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMKD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.911.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.800.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.332.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.57-2.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. KD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. KD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KD

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

KD

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMKD
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.76%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KD

27.92

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

KD’s P/E Ratio of 27.92 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KD

0.47

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, KD’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KD

6.00

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

KD’s P/B Ratio of 6.00 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM vs. KD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMKD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.5627.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.510.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.966.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.1313.88