IBKR vs. NMR: Interactive Brokers vs. Nomura Stock Comparison
How do Interactive Brokers (IBKR) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) and Nomura (NMR) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Japan |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 129.19 billion USD | 27.53 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 4, 2007 | December 17, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 11.53% | 35.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 57.15% | 37.86% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 34.54% | 18.78% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 40.72% | 29.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.66% | -38.40% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.24M | 789.26K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.18 | 1.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.26 | 1.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 23.67% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IBKR.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
23.67%
- Max
- 44.78%
- IBKR
- 23.67%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 16.68% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
16.68%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- IBKR
- 16.68%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 77.70% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
77.70%
- Max
- 107.33%
- IBKR
- 77.70%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 23.67% | 11.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.28% | 0.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.68% | 17.12% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 77.70% | 24.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 9.73% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.14% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.73% | 10.80% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 34.60% | 17.17% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.14% | 7.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 33.29% | 58.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 0.46% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
0.46%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- IBKR
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 12.79% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
12.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- IBKR
- 12.79%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.46% | 620.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 12.79% | 16.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.94 sits in the richer quartile — IBKR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
28.94
- Max
- 45.85
- IBKR
- 28.94
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 18.30 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
18.30
- IBKR
- 18.30
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — IBKR is pricier on assets.
IBKR
Financial Services industry group
5.53
- Max
- 7.79
- IBKR
- 5.53
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IBKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 28.94 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 18.30 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.53 | 1.15 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |