Seek Returns

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

IBDSF vs. SBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at IBDSF and SBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Company NameIberdrola, S.A.Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
CountrySpainBrazil
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesWater Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryElectric UtilitiesWater Utilities
Market Capitalization162.66 billion USD121.02 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeOTC Markets OTCIDNYSE
Listing DateDecember 8, 2006May 10, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

IBDSF is a standard domestic listing, while SBS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

IBDSF’s market capitalization stands at 162.66 billion USD, while SBS’s is 121.02 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

SBS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. IBDSF, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBDSF and SBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBDSF+115.26%
SBS+375.51%
IBDSF vs. SBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
5-Day Price Return0.30%-3.51%
13-Week Price Return8.88%30.10%
26-Week Price Return17.17%37.07%
52-Week Price Return25.76%50.99%
Month-to-Date Return1.24%7.34%
Year-to-Date Return8.26%27.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.91M4.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.80M3.46M
3-Month Volatility18.07%28.11%
Beta0.40-0.06

IBDSF has a positive beta (0.40), indicating it generally moves with the broader market, whereas SBS has a negative beta (-0.06), often moving inversely, which can offer diversification or hedging benefits.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBDSF

10.59%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
23.26%
Q3
14.53%
Median
10.39%
Q1
8.26%
Min
1.81%

IBDSF’s Return on Equity of 10.59% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SBS

20.65%

Water Utilities Industry
Max
20.65%
Q3
18.91%
Median
10.94%
Q1
7.11%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s Return on Equity of 20.65% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBDSF

7.91%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
30.48%
Q3
17.33%
Median
12.29%
Q1
7.53%
Min
-5.69%

IBDSF’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SBS

35.77%

Water Utilities Industry
Max
39.34%
Q3
24.86%
Median
18.09%
Q1
11.92%
Min
1.74%

A Net Profit Margin of 35.77% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBDSF

12.28%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
45.32%
Q3
25.58%
Median
17.81%
Q1
12.18%
Min
-4.02%

IBDSF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.28% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SBS

53.26%

Water Utilities Industry
Max
57.47%
Q3
40.70%
Median
36.89%
Q1
23.35%
Min
12.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 53.26% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Return on Equity (TTM)10.59%20.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.41%9.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%35.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.28%53.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.08%16.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBDSF

0.81

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
1.64
Q3
1.17
Median
0.92
Q1
0.71
Min
0.09

IBDSF’s Current Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SBS

1.12

Water Utilities Industry
Max
2.22
Q3
1.43
Median
1.14
Q1
0.81
Min
0.24

SBS’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Water Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBDSF

1.00

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
3.31
Q3
1.91
Median
1.29
Q1
0.63
Min
0.00

IBDSF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SBS

0.95

Water Utilities Industry
Max
5.95
Q3
3.59
Median
1.46
Q1
1.01
Min
0.51

Falling into the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBDSF

5.01

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
18.68
Q3
11.74
Median
4.89
Q1
2.70
Min
-3.31

IBDSF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SBS

7.77

Water Utilities Industry
Max
13.22
Q3
7.11
Median
3.45
Q1
2.23
Min
0.58

SBS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.77 is in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.811.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.000.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.017.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)291.88%11.82%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)77.49%-20.94%
3-Year Revenue CAGR-5.49%11.22%
5-Year Revenue CAGR6.56%10.93%

EPS Growth

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)516.67%80.71%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)8.84%-14.44%
3-Year EPS CAGR15.17%39.31%
5-Year EPS CAGR14.09%53.14%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBDSF

0.95%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
7.32%
Q3
4.28%
Median
3.12%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

IBDSF’s Dividend Yield of 0.95% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SBS

1.97%

Water Utilities Industry
Max
5.66%
Q3
3.88%
Median
3.00%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

SBS’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBDSF

50.28%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
137.57%
Q3
84.53%
Median
62.07%
Q1
31.79%
Min
0.00%

IBDSF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.28% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SBS

49.03%

Water Utilities Industry
Max
324.59%
Q3
231.08%
Median
88.02%
Q1
57.19%
Min
49.03%

SBS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.03% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.95%1.97%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.28%49.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBDSF

21.24

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
38.66
Q3
23.44
Median
18.35
Q1
12.34
Min
3.29

IBDSF’s P/E Ratio of 21.24 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SBS

14.15

Water Utilities Industry
Max
29.90
Q3
24.17
Median
22.20
Q1
14.19
Min
7.06

In the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s P/E Ratio of 14.15 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBDSF

1.68

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
7.25
Q3
3.76
Median
1.98
Q1
0.94
Min
0.16

IBDSF’s P/S Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SBS

5.06

Water Utilities Industry
Max
5.96
Q3
4.10
Median
2.97
Q1
2.78
Min
1.09

SBS’s P/S Ratio of 5.06 is in the upper echelon for the Water Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBDSF

1.86

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
2.89
Q3
2.01
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

IBDSF’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SBS

2.21

Water Utilities Industry
Max
4.31
Q3
2.60
Median
1.60
Q1
1.14
Min
0.61

SBS’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is within the conventional range for the Water Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBDSF vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBDSFSBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2414.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.685.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.862.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.4559.44