HWM vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at HWM and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HWM is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	HWM	PAC
Company Name	Howmet Aerospace Inc.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	81.46 billion USD	11.13 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 1, 2016	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HWM and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HWM vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	HWM	PAC
5-Day Price Return	-3.08%	3.15%
13-Week Price Return	18.71%	-13.20%
26-Week Price Return	28.42%	-5.98%
52-Week Price Return	75.60%	11.39%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.29%	5.22%
Year-to-Date Return	85.87%	10.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.03M	0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.29M	0.71M
3-Month Volatility	24.72%	23.93%
Beta	1.31	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HWM

29.70%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 23.64%
Median: 12.98%
Q1: 8.07%
Min: -2.55%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, HWM’s Return on Equity of 29.70% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PAC

45.58%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 14.62%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 6.63%
Min: 1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 45.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HWM

18.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.96%
Q3: 9.50%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: 4.45%
Min: 1.01%

HWM’s Net Profit Margin of 18.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PAC

24.13%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 56.87%
Q3: 31.71%
Median: 20.37%
Q1: 10.09%
Min: 1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 24.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HWM

25.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 17.97%
Q3: 12.09%
Median: 9.29%
Q1: 6.41%
Min: -1.59%

HWM’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PAC

41.95%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.60%
Q3: 47.00%
Median: 32.11%
Q1: 16.08%
Min: 1.73%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.95% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	HWM	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.70%	45.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	13.33%	12.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	18.18%	24.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	25.10%	41.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	33.43%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

2.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.37
Q3: 2.01
Median: 1.22
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.68

HWM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

1.29

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 2.77
Q3: 1.91
Median: 1.29
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

0.62

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.89
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.03

HWM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.62 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.53

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.64
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.53. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HWM

7.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 29.86
Q3: 19.49
Median: 7.09
Q1: 2.62
Min: -7.63

HWM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.45
Median: 7.97
Q1: 4.97
Min: 2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	HWM	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.35	1.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.96	1.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.62	2.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.92	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

HWM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HWM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HWM

0.20%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.87%
Q3: 1.46%
Median: 0.58%
Q1: 0.10%
Min: 0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Yield of 0.20% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

5.32%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.92%
Q3: 5.23%
Median: 2.46%
Q1: 1.94%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.32%, PAC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HWM

11.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 110.40%
Q3: 51.46%
Median: 20.20%
Q1: 4.21%
Min: 0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.31% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

128.34%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 206.16%
Q3: 111.39%
Median: 75.06%
Q1: 37.58%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 128.34% is in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	HWM	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.20%	5.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	11.31%	128.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HWM

55.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 94.22
Q3: 53.31
Median: 32.27
Q1: 24.64
Min: 14.57

A P/E Ratio of 55.41 places HWM in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PAC

17.45

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 37.73
Q3: 26.09
Median: 18.07
Q1: 13.50
Min: 6.41

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 17.45 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HWM

10.07

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 7.20
Q3: 3.95
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 10.07, HWM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PAC

4.21

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 8.65
Q3: 5.45
Median: 3.16
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.86

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

15.38

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 18.61
Q3: 9.58
Median: 5.45
Q1: 3.11
Min: 0.94

HWM’s P/B Ratio of 15.38 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC

8.66

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.71
Q3: 3.00
Median: 2.04
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.38

At 8.66, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HWM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	HWM	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	55.41	17.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	10.07	4.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	15.38	8.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	62.81	21.74