Seek Returns logo

HWM vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HWM and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHWMMMM
Company NameHowmet Aerospace Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization81.46 billion USD89.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 1, 2016January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HWM and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HWM vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHWMMMM
5-Day Price Return-3.08%-0.05%
13-Week Price Return18.71%9.97%
26-Week Price Return28.42%11.17%
52-Week Price Return75.60%27.49%
Month-to-Date Return-1.29%0.65%
Year-to-Date Return85.87%29.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.03M3.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.29M3.27M
3-Month Volatility24.72%26.50%
Beta1.311.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HWM

29.70%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, HWM’s Return on Equity of 29.70% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM

78.98%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.60%
Q3
13.46%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 78.98% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HWM

18.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

HWM’s Net Profit Margin of 18.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MMM

13.70%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.45%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HWM

25.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

HWM’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM

19.81%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.77%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.81% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHWMMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)29.70%78.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.33%8.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.18%13.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.10%19.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.43%40.98%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

2.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

HWM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MMM

1.84

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.64
Median
1.35
Q1
1.15
Min
0.50

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.84 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

0.62

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

HWM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.62 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

2.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.52
Median
0.90
Q1
0.64
Min
0.20

MMM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Industrial Conglomerates industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HWM

7.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

HWM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
13.50
Q3
9.20
Median
4.18
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHWMMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.351.84
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.961.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.622.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.92-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

HWM vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HWM vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HWM

0.20%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Yield of 0.20% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.75%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.91%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.21%
Q1
1.62%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HWM

11.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.31% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

45.66%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
52.41%
Q1
31.27%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.66% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHWMMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.20%1.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.31%45.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HWM

55.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

A P/E Ratio of 55.41 places HWM in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM

26.08

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
27.19
Median
16.85
Q1
7.93
Min
3.88

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 26.08 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HWM

10.07

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 10.07, HWM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM

3.57

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.36
Median
0.76
Q1
0.43
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.57 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HWM

15.38

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

HWM’s P/B Ratio of 15.38 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM

17.86

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.48
Q3
2.86
Median
1.03
Q1
0.51
Min
0.30

At 17.86, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HWM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHWMMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)55.4126.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.073.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.3817.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)62.8129.36