Seek Returns logo

HUM vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUM and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HUM is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolHUMTEVA
Company NameHumana Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization30.66 billion USD23.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUM and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUM vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUMTEVA
5-Day Price Return-0.69%5.40%
13-Week Price Return6.42%11.77%
26-Week Price Return-3.81%8.00%
52-Week Price Return-18.59%11.38%
Month-to-Date Return-14.32%4.58%
Year-to-Date Return2.55%-20.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.91M1.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.77M1.86M
3-Month Volatility45.81%28.52%
Beta0.44-0.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUM

9.02%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HUM’s Return on Equity of 9.02% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUM

1.28%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

HUM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUM

2.68%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HUM’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.68% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUMTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)9.02%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.19%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.28%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.68%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

0.01

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HUM’s Current Ratio of 0.01 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

0.69

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HUM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUM

3.61

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

HUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.61 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUMTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.011.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.010.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.692.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.61-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUM vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUM vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUM

1.39%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.39% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUM

14.15%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.15% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUMTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.39%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.15%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUM

19.62

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

HUM’s P/E Ratio of 19.62 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUM

0.25

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, HUM’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TEVA

1.34

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.34 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

1.62

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

HUM’s P/B Ratio of 1.62 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEVA

2.87

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUM vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUMTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.62--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.251.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.622.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.9119.84