Seek Returns logo

HUM vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUM and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HUM is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolHUMPHG
Company NameHumana Inc.Koninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization34.12 billion USD26.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUM and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUM vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUMPHG
5-Day Price Return11.16%2.74%
13-Week Price Return18.37%16.41%
26-Week Price Return7.23%0.64%
52-Week Price Return15.10%-18.72%
Month-to-Date Return9.05%2.52%
Year-to-Date Return11.83%-3.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.39M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.84M1.59M
3-Month Volatility50.94%26.08%
Beta0.461.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUM

9.02%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HUM’s Return on Equity of 9.02% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUM

1.28%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

HUM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUM

2.68%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HUM’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.68% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUMPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)9.02%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.19%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.28%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.68%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

0.01

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HUM’s Current Ratio of 0.01 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

0.69

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HUM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUM

3.61

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

HUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.61 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUMPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.011.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.010.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.611.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUM vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUM vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUM

1.30%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUM

14.15%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.15% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUMPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.15%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUM

20.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

HUM’s P/E Ratio of 20.98 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHG

139.46

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

At 139.46, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUM

0.27

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, HUM’s P/S Ratio of 0.27 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUM

1.62

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

HUM’s P/B Ratio of 1.62 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HUM vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUMPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.98139.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.271.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.621.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.5914.60