Seek Returns logo

HUBS vs. VRSN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUBS and VRSN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHUBSVRSN
Company NameHubSpot, Inc.VeriSign, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareIT Services
Market Capitalization27.28 billion USD26.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 9, 2014January 30, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUBS and VRSN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUBS vs. VRSN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUBSVRSN
5-Day Price Return-13.11%-3.09%
13-Week Price Return-21.08%-4.90%
26-Week Price Return-25.81%7.92%
52-Week Price Return-17.18%44.73%
Month-to-Date Return-5.89%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return-36.82%32.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.05M0.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.88M0.82M
3-Month Volatility43.50%28.81%
Beta1.470.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUBS

-0.62%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VRSN

113.55%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

VRSN’s Return on Equity of 113.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-0.42%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VRSN

50.03%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

VRSN’s Net Profit Margin of 50.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-2.59%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.59%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VRSN

67.89%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

VRSN’s Operating Profit Margin of 67.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUBSVRSN
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.62%113.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.32%55.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.42%50.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.59%67.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)84.55%87.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

1.79

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSN

0.54

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

VRSN’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSN

1.07

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

VRSN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

-2.05

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VRSN

27.96

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

VRSN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.96 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUBSVRSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.790.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.0527.96

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUBS vs. VRSN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUBS vs. VRSN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRSN

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRSN

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUBSVRSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for HUBS is currently unavailable.

VRSN

32.41

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

VRSN’s P/E Ratio of 32.41 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

8.66

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 8.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSN

16.22

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 16.22, VRSN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

14.22

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

HUBS’s P/B Ratio of 14.22 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSN

11.17

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

VRSN’s P/B Ratio of 11.17 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HUBS vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUBSVRSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--32.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.6616.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.2211.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.1027.28
HUBS vs. VRSN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison