Seek Returns logo

HUBS vs. TTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUBS and TTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHUBSTTD
Company NameHubSpot, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySoftwareMedia
Market Capitalization23.07 billion USD26.58 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateOctober 9, 2014September 21, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUBS and TTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUBS vs. TTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUBSTTD
5-Day Price Return-5.22%-38.46%
13-Week Price Return-33.94%-31.54%
26-Week Price Return-43.74%-52.59%
52-Week Price Return-6.72%-43.98%
Month-to-Date Return-15.76%-37.49%
Year-to-Date Return-37.17%-53.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.37M25.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.84M12.40M
3-Month Volatility41.27%88.12%
Beta1.621.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUBS

-0.62%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TTD

15.19%

Media Industry

Max
34.77%
Q3
16.01%
Median
10.70%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.36%

TTD’s Return on Equity of 15.19% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-0.42%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TTD

15.57%

Media Industry

Max
16.04%
Q3
10.15%
Median
5.18%
Q1
2.39%
Min
-3.66%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.57% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-3.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TTD

17.73%

Media Industry

Max
24.65%
Q3
13.68%
Median
8.96%
Q1
4.53%
Min
-8.09%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUBSTTD
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.62%15.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.32%7.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.42%15.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.10%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)84.55%79.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

1.79

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTD

1.71

Media Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.79
Median
1.39
Q1
0.92
Min
0.24

TTD’s Current Ratio of 1.71 aligns with the median group of the Media industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTD

0.03

Media Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.06
Median
0.58
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Media industry, TTD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

-2.05

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TTD

44.57

Media Industry

Max
44.57
Q3
23.07
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

TTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 44.57 is in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUBSTTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.701.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.0544.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUBS vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUBS vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
7.76%
Q3
4.16%
Median
1.67%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
165.03%
Q3
96.17%
Median
45.64%
Q1
14.80%
Min
0.00%

TTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUBSTTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for HUBS is currently unavailable.

TTD

62.35

Media Industry

Max
49.10
Q3
35.07
Median
17.34
Q1
10.39
Min
5.81

At 62.35, TTD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Media industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

7.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 7.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTD

9.71

Media Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.85
Median
1.05
Q1
0.78
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 9.71, TTD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Media industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

14.22

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

HUBS’s P/B Ratio of 14.22 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTD

13.12

Media Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.57
Median
1.83
Q1
1.19
Min
0.51

At 13.12, TTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Media industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HUBS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Media industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUBSTTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--62.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.849.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.2213.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.5734.88