Seek Returns logo

HUBS vs. NOK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUBS and NOK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HUBS is a standard domestic listing, while NOK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolHUBSNOK
Company NameHubSpot, Inc.Nokia Oyj
CountryUnited StatesFinland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization27.28 billion USD25.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 9, 2014July 1, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUBS and NOK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUBS vs. NOK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUBSNOK
5-Day Price Return-13.11%1.54%
13-Week Price Return-21.08%-7.42%
26-Week Price Return-25.81%-17.75%
52-Week Price Return-17.18%-30.85%
Month-to-Date Return-5.89%10.87%
Year-to-Date Return-36.82%-4.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.05M25.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.88M11.09M
3-Month Volatility43.50%30.86%
Beta1.470.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUBS

-0.62%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NOK

5.01%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

NOK’s Return on Equity of 5.01% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-0.42%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NOK

5.31%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

NOK’s Net Profit Margin of 5.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-2.59%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.59%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NOK

6.21%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

NOK’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.21% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUBSNOK
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.62%5.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.32%2.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.42%5.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.59%6.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)84.55%44.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

1.79

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NOK

1.46

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

NOK’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NOK

0.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, NOK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

-2.05

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NOK

34.19

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

NOK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.19 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUBSNOK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.701.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.0534.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUBS vs. NOK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUBS vs. NOK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NOK

3.22%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NOK’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NOK

50.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NOK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.74% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUBSNOK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%50.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for HUBS is currently unavailable.

NOK

21.54

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

NOK’s P/E Ratio of 21.54 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

8.66

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 8.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NOK

1.14

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

NOK’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

14.22

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

HUBS’s P/B Ratio of 14.22 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NOK

1.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

NOK’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HUBS vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUBSNOK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--21.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.661.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.221.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.1014.85
HUBS vs. NOK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison