Seek Returns logo

HPQ vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HPQ and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHPQUBER
Company NameHP Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization25.49 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HPQ and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HPQ vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHPQUBER
5-Day Price Return7.06%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return-3.96%3.10%
26-Week Price Return-16.75%29.78%
52-Week Price Return-19.66%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return9.44%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return-16.82%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.25M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.93M21.23M
3-Month Volatility34.65%32.88%
Beta1.331.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HPQ

16.85%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

HPQ’s Return on Equity of 16.85% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HPQ

4.64%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

HPQ’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HPQ

6.31%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

HPQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.31% is around the midpoint for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHPQUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)16.85%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.47%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.64%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.31%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.15%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.73

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

HPQ’s Current Ratio of 0.73 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.32

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

HPQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

8.25

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

HPQ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHPQUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.731.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.420.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.25-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

HPQ vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HPQ vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HPQ

4.26%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.26%, HPQ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

42.79%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.79% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHPQUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.26%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)42.79%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

10.05

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

In the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, HPQ’s P/E Ratio of 10.05 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

0.47

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

HPQ’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.90

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

HPQ’s P/B Ratio of 0.90 is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HPQ vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHPQUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.0514.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.474.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.908.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.7522.17