Seek Returns logo

HPQ vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HPQ and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHPQTTWO
Company NameHP Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsEntertainment
Market Capitalization24.97 billion USD47.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HPQ and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HPQ vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHPQTTWO
5-Day Price Return-0.98%5.83%
13-Week Price Return11.32%6.39%
26-Week Price Return-5.16%19.67%
52-Week Price Return-23.10%68.81%
Month-to-Date Return-4.59%10.76%
Year-to-Date Return-16.55%40.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.29M2.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.06M1.90M
3-Month Volatility27.50%24.29%
Beta1.321.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HPQ

16.85%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

HPQ’s Return on Equity of 16.85% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HPQ

4.83%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

HPQ’s Net Profit Margin of 4.83% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HPQ

5.85%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

HPQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.85% is around the midpoint for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHPQTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)16.85%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.71%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.83%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.89%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.74

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

HPQ’s Current Ratio of 0.74 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.32

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

HPQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

8.25

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

HPQ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHPQTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.741.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.441.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.25-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

HPQ vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HPQ vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HPQ

4.36%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Yield of 4.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

40.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHPQTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.36%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.95%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

9.38

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

HPQ’s P/E Ratio of 9.38 is below the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HPQ

0.45

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, HPQ’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TTWO

8.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.16 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HPQ

0.90

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

HPQ’s P/B Ratio of 0.90 is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HPQ vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHPQTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.38--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.458.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9012.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.29210.39