Seek Returns logo

HPE vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HPE and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHPEUBER
Company NameHewlett Packard Enterprise CompanyUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization31.51 billion USD195.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 19, 2015May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HPE and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HPE vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHPEUBER
5-Day Price Return1.36%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return15.98%3.89%
26-Week Price Return44.20%12.49%
52-Week Price Return11.38%28.68%
Month-to-Date Return-2.21%-2.49%
Year-to-Date Return11.85%56.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.63M20.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.14M17.38M
3-Month Volatility35.33%30.01%
Beta1.341.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HPE

5.08%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

HPE’s Return on Equity of 5.08% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HPE

3.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

HPE’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

UBER’s Net Profit Margin of 33.54% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HPE

3.91%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

HPE’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.91% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHPEUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)5.08%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.74%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.77%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.91%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.45%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HPE

0.95

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

HPE’s Current Ratio of 0.95 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HPE

0.97

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

HPE’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HPE

116.71

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

HPE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 116.71 is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHPEUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.691.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.970.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)116.71-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

HPE vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HPE vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HPE

2.42%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Yield of 2.42% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HPE

24.59%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.59% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHPEUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.42%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)24.59%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HPE

25.28

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

HPE’s P/E Ratio of 25.28 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

11.73

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.73 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HPE

0.95

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

HPE’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

3.94

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 3.94, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HPE

1.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

HPE’s P/B Ratio of 1.11 is within the conventional range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HPE vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHPEUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.2811.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.953.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.117.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.6722.54