Seek Returns logo

HON vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HON and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHONMTZ
Company NameHoneywell International Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization133.44 billion USD16.97 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HON and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HON vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHONMTZ
5-Day Price Return0.91%3.34%
13-Week Price Return-9.61%24.87%
26-Week Price Return-1.23%73.41%
52-Week Price Return1.38%73.30%
Month-to-Date Return-4.10%17.13%
Year-to-Date Return-6.81%56.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.55M0.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.66M0.91M
3-Month Volatility18.82%33.54%
Beta1.071.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HON

32.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

HON’s Return on Equity of 32.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HON

14.30%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.30% places HON in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HON

17.81%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.81% places HON in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHONMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)32.86%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.56%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.81%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.08%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HON

1.29

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

HON’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HON

2.27

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

HON’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Industrial Conglomerates industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HON

7.76

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

HON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHONMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.291.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.270.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.762.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

HON vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HON vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HON

2.20%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

HON’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HON

51.34%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

HON’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.34% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHONMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)51.34%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HON

23.34

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

HON’s P/E Ratio of 23.34 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ

62.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.85, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HON

3.34

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

HON’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MTZ

1.28

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HON

9.30

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 9.30, HON’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HON vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHONMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.3462.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.341.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.304.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8618.12