HMC vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at HMC and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TPR is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	HMC	TPR
Company Name	Honda Motor Co., Ltd.	Tapestry, Inc.
Country	Japan	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Automobiles	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	44.45 billion USD	23.58 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 6, 2000
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HMC and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HMC vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	HMC	TPR
5-Day Price Return	4.61%	4.66%
13-Week Price Return	9.34%	37.35%
26-Week Price Return	19.83%	38.11%
52-Week Price Return	36.87%	202.83%
Month-to-Date Return	4.78%	5.09%
Year-to-Date Return	7.10%	73.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume	21.83M	4.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume	20.70M	4.40M
3-Month Volatility	34.29%	34.34%
Beta	1.26	1.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HMC

6.53%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

HMC’s Return on Equity of 6.53% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

39.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Equity of 39.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HMC

3.85%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

HMC’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TPR

12.50%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.50% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HMC

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

HMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

16.19%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.19% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	HMC	TPR
Return on Equity (TTM)	6.53%	39.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.72%	8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.85%	12.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.59%	16.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	21.50%	75.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HMC

1.36

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

HMC’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.76

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HMC

0.93

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

HMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

1.81

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HMC

685.89

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 685.89, HMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TPR

9.10

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	HMC	TPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.36	1.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.07	1.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	685.89	9.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

HMC vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HMC vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HMC

4.38%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HMC’s Dividend Yield of 4.38% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPR

1.30%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HMC

49.32%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

HMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.32% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	HMC	TPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.38%	1.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	49.32%	35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HMC

9.51

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

HMC’s P/E Ratio of 9.51 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

27.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

TPR’s P/E Ratio of 27.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HMC

0.37

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

HMC’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

3.42

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.42 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HMC

0.58

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

HMC’s P/B Ratio of 0.58 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

9.76

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

TPR’s P/B Ratio of 9.76 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HMC vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	HMC	TPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	9.51	27.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.37	3.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.58	9.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	31.71	27.29