Seek Returns logo

HLT vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HLT and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HLT is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolHLTVIPS
Company NameHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization63.48 billion USD8.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HLT and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HLT vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLTVIPS
5-Day Price Return-0.16%-3.87%
13-Week Price Return5.24%7.69%
26-Week Price Return0.14%7.62%
52-Week Price Return25.80%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return0.68%10.40%
Year-to-Date Return9.20%23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.52M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M3.29M
3-Month Volatility20.55%30.95%
Beta1.220.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

13.84%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

21.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.13% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLTVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)171.01%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.75%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.84%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.13%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.73%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

0.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLTVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.541.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.491.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)73.650.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.07150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

HLT vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HLT vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HLT

0.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.23% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HLT

9.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.25% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLTVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.23%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.25%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HLT

39.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 39.88 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HLT

5.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HLT vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLTVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.887.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.520.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)245.971.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.52--