Seek Returns logo

HLT vs. PAG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HLT and PAG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHLTPAG
Company NameHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization61.56 billion USD11.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013October 23, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HLT and PAG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HLT vs. PAG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLTPAG
5-Day Price Return-1.42%0.00%
13-Week Price Return-2.59%1.22%
26-Week Price Return10.47%15.94%
52-Week Price Return10.70%6.78%
Month-to-Date Return-6.02%-5.69%
Year-to-Date Return4.97%14.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.78M0.24M
3-Month Volatility19.37%27.90%
Beta1.220.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAG

17.87%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

PAG’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

13.84%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAG

3.13%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

PAG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

21.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.13% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAG

4.47%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

PAG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLTPAG
Return on Equity (TTM)171.01%17.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.75%5.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.84%3.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.13%4.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.73%16.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

0.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PAG

0.90

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

PAG’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PAG

1.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

PAG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAG

17.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

PAG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLTPAG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.540.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.490.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)73.651.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.0717.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

HLT vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HLT vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HLT

0.24%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAG

2.74%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Yield of 2.74% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HLT

9.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.25% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAG

33.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.11% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLTPAG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%2.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.25%33.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HLT

37.96

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

A P/E Ratio of 37.96 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PAG

12.10

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/E Ratio of 12.10 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HLT

5.25

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.25 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAG

0.38

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/S Ratio of 0.38 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAG

2.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

PAG’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HLT vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLTPAG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9612.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.250.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)245.972.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.0917.91