Seek Returns logo

HLT vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HLT and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHLTMBLY
Company NameHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.Mobileye Global Inc.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization63.48 billion USD11.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013October 26, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HLT and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HLT vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLTMBLY
5-Day Price Return-0.16%-0.72%
13-Week Price Return5.24%-11.83%
26-Week Price Return0.14%-20.53%
52-Week Price Return25.80%-6.85%
Month-to-Date Return0.68%-2.67%
Year-to-Date Return9.20%-30.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.52M4.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M5.42M
3-Month Volatility20.55%51.23%
Beta1.220.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

13.84%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HLT

21.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.13% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLTMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)171.01%-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.75%-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.84%-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.13%-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.73%48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

0.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLTMBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.546.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.495.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)73.650.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.07-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

HLT vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HLT vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HLT

0.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.23% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HLT

9.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.25% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLTMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.23%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.25%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HLT

39.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 39.88 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HLT

5.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HLT vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLTMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.88--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.525.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)245.971.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.5219.33