Haleon (HLN) vs. Unilever (UL)

Company Profile

Haleon (HLN) and Unilever (UL) are both classified in the Personal Care Products sub-industry within the broader Personal Care Products industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Unilever (UL) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 25, 1980, whereas Haleon (HLN) listed on July 25, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Both Haleon (HLN, ADR) and Unilever (UL, ADR) trade as depositary receipts or similar foreign-share lines; core company financials may still be comparable, but trading line, FX, program fees, dividend withholding, and home-market rules are worth keeping in view.

Valuation

Both Haleon (HLN) at 17.92 and Unilever (UL) at 18.29 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.

Unilever (UL) at 2.36 is priced about in line with its industry on Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Haleon (HLN) at 3.59 sits in the pricier quartile — HLN costs more per dollar of sales.

Haleon (HLN) at 1.81 is valued about in line with its industry on Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Unilever (UL) at 6.63 carries a peer-beating premium to book — UL is pricier on assets.

Valuation at a Glance

Profitability

Both Haleon (HLN) at 10.27% and Unilever (UL) at 30.96% post Return on Equity (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on this measure.

For every dollar of sales, both Haleon (HLN) at 15.11% and Unilever (UL) at 18.75% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top Net Profit Margin (TTM) quartile of their industries.

Both Haleon (HLN) at 23.17% and Unilever (UL) at 20.05% squeeze more operating profit from each sales dollar than most peers, ranking in the top Operating Profit Margin (TTM) quartile of their industries.

Profitability at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Financial Strength

Both Haleon (HLN) at 0.92 and Unilever (UL) at 0.79 run Current Ratio (MRQ) in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Haleon (HLN) at 0.52 carries Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) around its industry mid-range, while Unilever (UL) at 1.61 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Dividends

Both Haleon (HLN) at 2.15% and Unilever (UL) at 4.14% report Dividend Yield (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on cash yield relative to share price.

Haleon (HLN) at 37.08% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Unilever (UL) at 78.60% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.

Dividends at a Glance

Performance & Risk

Performance & Risk at a Glance