Seek Returns logo

HLN vs. TAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HLN and TAK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both HLN and TAK are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolHLNTAK
Company NameHaleon plcTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
CountryUnited KingdomJapan
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesHealth Care
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization43.85 billion USD48.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2022January 5, 2010
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HLN and TAK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HLN vs. TAK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLNTAK
5-Day Price Return1.11%0.00%
13-Week Price Return-11.44%8.33%
26-Week Price Return-6.73%8.70%
52-Week Price Return-1.96%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return1.39%7.43%
Year-to-Date Return-3.42%7.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.79M4.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.89M4.17M
3-Month Volatility16.19%15.27%
Beta0.400.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TAK

1.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TAK’s Return on Equity of 1.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TAK

2.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.36% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TAK

7.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLNTAK
Return on Equity (TTM)3.26%1.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.58%0.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.84%2.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.64%7.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.75%65.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TAK’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TAK

0.65

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

TAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TAK

2.05

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLNTAK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.871.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.002.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

HLN vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HLN vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TAK

4.23%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.23%, TAK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TAK

138.69%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TAK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 138.69% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLNTAK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.72%4.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)954.40%138.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HLN

22.43

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

HLN’s P/E Ratio of 22.43 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TAK

66.26

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 66.26, TAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HLN

2.88

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

HLN’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TAK

1.56

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

TAK’s P/S Ratio of 1.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TAK’s P/B Ratio of 1.01 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HLN vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLNTAK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.4366.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.881.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.111.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.0410.08