Seek Returns

Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG)

This page compares Haleon (HLN) with Procter & Gamble (PG) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Haleon (HLN) and Procter & Gamble (PG) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but HLN is classified in Personal Care Products while PG is classified in Household Products.

Procter & Gamble (PG) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 2, 1962, whereas Haleon (HLN) listed on July 25, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Procter & Gamble (PG) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Haleon (HLN) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

SymbolHLNPG
Company NameHaleon plcThe Procter & Gamble Company
Country/RegionUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHousehold Products
GICS Sub-IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization40.75 billion USD329.03 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2022January 2, 1962
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

HLN
PG
Loading price history…
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
5-Day Price Return3.79%-0.66%
13-Week Price Return-16.35%-11.44%
26-Week Price Return-8.62%-4.87%
52-Week Price Return-17.26%-14.24%
Month-to-Date Return0.68%-3.94%
Year-to-Date Return-8.67%-1.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.71M8.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.75M10.53M
3-Month Volatility27.52%21.45%
Beta0.420.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 10.30% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 31.23% post Return on Equity (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on this measure.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

10.30%

Max
56.82%
Q3
44.03%
Median
14.83%
Q1
8.27%
Min
-15.43%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

31.23%

Max
56.82%
Q3
44.03%
Median
14.83%
Q1
8.27%
Min
-15.43%
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 15.11% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.16% rank in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM) among industry peers, indicating both companies convert revenue into net income more strongly than typical competitors.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

15.11%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.57%
Median
6.87%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-5.39%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.16%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.57%
Median
6.87%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-5.39%
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 21.87% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.59% rank in the top quartile for Operating Profit Margin (TTM) among industry peers, indicating both companies convert revenue into operating income more strongly than typical competitors.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

21.87%

Max
23.59%
Q3
16.82%
Median
11.03%
Q1
4.90%
Min
-6.14%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

23.59%

Max
23.59%
Q3
16.82%
Median
11.03%
Q1
4.90%
Min
-6.14%
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
Return on Equity (TTM)10.30%31.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.17%13.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.11%19.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.87%23.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.69%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 0.92 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 run Current Ratio (MRQ) in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.92

Max
4.51
Q3
2.63
Median
1.79
Q1
0.95
Min
0.73

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.73

Max
4.51
Q3
2.63
Median
1.79
Q1
0.95
Min
0.73
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 0.52 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 post Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on leverage.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.52

Max
1.83
Q3
1.83
Median
0.76
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.68

Max
1.83
Q3
1.83
Median
0.76
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) posts Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of 47.04, above its industry benchmark range, while Haleon (HLN) at 8.29 sits closer to the industry mid-range.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

8.29

Max
34.29
Q3
17.39
Median
8.17
Q1
3.35
Min
-3.28

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

47.04

Max
34.29
Q3
17.39
Median
8.17
Q1
3.35
Min
-3.28
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.920.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.710.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.2947.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)101.16%7.38%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-1.81%3.33%
3-Year Revenue CAGR0.53%1.67%
5-Year Revenue CAGR2.20%3.50%

EPS Growth

Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)280.16%5.73%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)17.57%8.59%
3-Year EPS CAGR17.21%3.88%
5-Year EPS CAGR8.30%5.58%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 2.05% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.09% report Dividend Yield (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on cash yield relative to share price.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.05%

Max
7.74%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.09%

Max
7.74%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 36.71% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 61.24% maintain Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around their industries’ median — balanced dividend policy on both sides, returning cash while leaving part of reported earnings available for reinvestment or balance-sheet flexibility.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

36.71%

Max
127.85%
Q3
61.48%
Median
36.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.24%

Max
127.85%
Q3
61.48%
Median
36.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.05%3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.71%61.24%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 17.91 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.84 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

17.91

Max
37.54
Q3
25.17
Median
16.40
Q1
13.88
Min
5.28

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.84

Max
37.54
Q3
25.17
Median
16.40
Q1
13.88
Min
5.28
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 2.71 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.80 trade in the higher-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) among industry peers, indicating higher trailing revenue multiples than typical peers.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.71

Max
3.80
Q3
2.10
Median
1.74
Q1
0.71
Min
0.25

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.80

Max
3.80
Q3
2.10
Median
1.74
Q1
0.71
Min
0.25
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Both Haleon (HLN) at 2.03 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.17 post Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on book-value multiple.

HLN

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.03

Max
12.04
Q3
7.18
Median
3.30
Q1
1.57
Min
0.57

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

6.17

Max
12.04
Q3
7.18
Median
3.30
Q1
1.57
Min
0.57
Haleon (HLN) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLNPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.9119.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.713.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.036.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.4521.93