Haleon (HLN) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB)

Company Profile

Haleon (HLN) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but HLN is classified in Personal Care Products while KMB is classified in Household Products.

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Haleon (HLN) listed on July 25, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Haleon (HLN) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Historical Performance

Historical Performance at a Glance

Profitability

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) posts Return on Equity (TTM) of 143.64%, above its industry benchmark range, while Haleon (HLN) at 10.30% sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Both Haleon (HLN) at 15.11% and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 12.80% rank in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM) among industry peers, indicating both companies convert revenue into net income more strongly than typical competitors.

Haleon (HLN) at 21.87% ranks in the top quartile for Operating Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 14.93%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Profitability at a Glance

Financial Strength

Both Haleon (HLN) at 0.92 and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 0.77 run Current Ratio (MRQ) in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Haleon (HLN) at 0.52 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 3.96 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Both Haleon (HLN) at 8.29 and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 9.84 post Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on interest-coverage headroom.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Dividend

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 5.23% reports Dividend Yield (TTM) in the top quartile of industry peers, ahead of Haleon (HLN) at 2.05%, which sits around the industry mid-range.

Haleon (HLN) at 36.71% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 78.95% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.

Dividend at a Glance

Valuation

Both Haleon (HLN) at 17.91 and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 15.11 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 1.93 carries typical industry Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Haleon (HLN) at 2.71 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — HLN carries a higher trailing revenue multiple relative to peers.

Haleon (HLN) at 2.03 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 17.83 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated book-value multiple for KMB relative to peers.

Valuation at a Glance